Over the last few years I?ve been making an effort to sort out my genealogy files, make sure every statement has a proper source citation and to fill in the gaps in my family tree. As with much in my life, this is a project characterised by lengthy periods of inactivity, punctuated by the occasional bout of intense industry. At times the sheer size of the task can seem overwhelming and, needless to say, it?s nowhere near completion.?
The recent Christmas break has given me the opportunity to do a little more work on my family research and I?ve been concentrating on the ancestors of my paternal grandfather.?
One result of taking (or at least trying to take) a logical, methodical approach to researching and documenting your family history is that it raises questions you may not consider when skipping merrily from branch to branch as the fancy takes you. For me, one of these questions is, ?Just who should I be researching?? Or, to put it another way, ?Who belongs on the family tree???
A gathering of the Sykes family. Only two people in this photograph are actually my ancestors. Do I need to research the rest?
This might seem a simple enough question, but one thing I?ve realised from chatting with other genealogists is that our concept of family can differ greatly. Perhaps because I began my research with very little information and having had few family stories passed down to me, my definition of who belongs on my family tree has generally been quite narrow: direct ancestors and their children only. Until I?ve tied down the people I?m actually descended from (some of whom are pretty elusive), I don?t feel I should be spending time on tracing aunties, uncles, cousins, second-cousins, step-children etc. etc.?
Conversely, some family historians seem to have a much broader view of what constitutes ?their family?. Perhaps having grown up surrounded by a big family or hearing stories about many of their relatives, they are keen to trace the lives of great-aunts and -uncles, cousins and even more distant relations.?
Of course, I realise that it may be helpful to research collateral lines in order to identify your ancestors and to trace earlier generations. I have a few ?problem? ancestors for whom tracing the births, marriages and deaths of all children has been the only way to figure out who they were. This approach can even be extended to researching your ancestors ?FANs? - that is, their Friends, Associates and Neighbours (e.g. identifying the witnesses to your ancestors? marriage, who may turn out to be relatives).?But problem ancestors aside, where do you draw the line? The abundance of information, especially digitised records, now available online makes this an increasingly pressing question. Once upon a time, finding a marriage record for my English ancestors meant visiting a large reference library and searching through the GRO fiche quarter by quarter, comparing volume and page numbers, then sending off for the certificate and hoping I?d identified the right one. It wouldn?t have occurred to me to do the same thing for each of their brothers and sisters.?
Recently, thanks largely to the fact that both the Church of England parish registers and baptist chapel registers for where my ancestors lived are now available on www.ancestry.co.uk, I was able to locate marriage and death information for all seven children born to one of my ancestral couples in a few hours spent at my computer.?If time and money were no object, I think most family history enthusiasts would want to trace not only their own ancestors but also the wider families of which they were a part. However, few of us have that luxury and, with limited resources, there is the argument that the more people you have in your genealogy files, the less time you have to research each one, so that your family history risks becoming little more than a collection of names and dates.?
With the start of another year, many genealogy bloggers have been posting their genealogy goals for 2013. Organising the information already collected and focussing efforts on a particular family line or problem are common aims.?
Deciding who to research is the first step in any genealogy plan, so I?m interested to hear from other researchers, how do you decide who belongs on your family tree?
Source: http://professionaldescendant.blogspot.com/2013/01/who-belongs-on-family-tree.html
nike nfl uniforms ben and jerrys free cone day tornado in dallas texas the island president the maldives harper lee mega millions numbers
No comments:
Post a Comment